TSTP Solution File: SWV314-2 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SWV314-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory   : 2006MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 06:56:49 EST 2010

% Result   : GaveUp 0.44s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18475/SWV/SWV314-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ....... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 6]
% GIVE UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 0
% 	resolvents: 0	factors: 0
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: -nan
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 6		
% Total = 6
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% Average size of a generated clause: -nan
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c_in_3		(+)3	(-)3
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)3	(-)3
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 6
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 0
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 0
% Number of unification failures: 0
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 9
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 0
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 0
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 24
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 7
% Number of states in UCFA table: 52
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 53
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.98
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 58
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 0
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: -nan
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 0 secs
% CPU time: 0.42 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------