TSTP Solution File: SWV314-2 by SATCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SWV314-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:28:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.35s
% Output   : Proof 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5)]) ).

cnf(g6,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
    | c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
    | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OtwayRees_Osecrecy__lemma__dest_0)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SWV314-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 23:22:54 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  % symbols: 26
% 0.13/0.35  % clauses: 7
% 0.13/0.35  % start clauses: 6
% 0.13/0.35  % iterative deepening steps: 6
% 0.13/0.35  % maximum path limit: 0
% 0.13/0.35  % literal attempts: 6
% 0.13/0.35  % depth failures: 0
% 0.13/0.35  % regularity failures: 0
% 0.13/0.35  % tautology failures: 0
% 0.13/0.35  % reductions: 0
% 0.13/0.35  % extensions: 5
% 0.13/0.35  % SAT variables: 41
% 0.13/0.35  % SAT clauses: 48
% 0.13/0.35  % WalkSAT solutions: 40
% 0.13/0.35  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------