TSTP Solution File: SYN053-1 by E-SAT---3.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.0
% Problem  : SYN053-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:00:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   5 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (  10   ~;  12   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    1 (   1   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (  10 sgn   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    p: $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    big_f: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    a: $i ).

cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( p
    | big_f(X1)
    | ~ big_f(a) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4) ).

cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).

cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( p
    | big_f(X1)
    | big_f(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_1) ).

cnf(clause_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_f(a)
    | ~ big_f(b) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_5) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( p
    | big_f(X1)
    | ~ big_f(a) ),
    clause_4 ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p,
    clause_3 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( p
    | big_f(X1)
    | big_f(X2) ),
    clause_1 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_f(a)
    | ~ big_f(b) ),
    clause_5 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X1)
    | ~ big_f(a) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X1)
    | big_f(X2) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_f(a),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(X1),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem    : SYN053-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  5 01:26:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.46  Running first-order on 8 cores model finding
% 0.18/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46  # Version: 3.0pre003
% 0.18/0.46  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46  # new_bool_3 with pid 29195 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.46  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.18/0.46  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.46  # ...ProofStateSinE()=5/5
% 0.18/0.46  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.46  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 29200 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.46  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.18/0.46  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.46  # ...ProofStateSinE()=5/5
% 0.18/0.46  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.46  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.46  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.46  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.46  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.46  # Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 0.18/0.46  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.18/0.46  # Initial clauses                      : 5
% 0.18/0.46  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.18/0.46  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.18/0.46  # Processed clauses                    : 10
% 0.18/0.46  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.18/0.46  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.18/0.46  # ...remaining for further processing  : 10
% 0.18/0.46  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.18/0.46  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.46  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.18/0.46  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.18/0.46  # Generated clauses                    : 4
% 0.18/0.46  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.18/0.46  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.46  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.18/0.46  # Paramodulations                      : 2
% 0.18/0.46  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.18/0.46  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.46  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.18/0.46  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.46  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.46  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.46  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.46  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.46  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.46  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 0.18/0.46  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.18/0.46  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.46  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.18/0.46  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.18/0.46  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.18/0.46  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3
% 0.18/0.46  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.46  # Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.18/0.46  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.18/0.46  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.18/0.46  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.18/0.46  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.18/0.46  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.46  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.18/0.46  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.18/0.46  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/0.46  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.46  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 136
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.46  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.46  # Total time               : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.46  # Maximum resident set size: 1644 pages
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.46  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.46  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.46  # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------