TSTP Solution File: SYN429-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN429-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:07:32 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.04s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5031/SYN/SYN429-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 48] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 827] [nf = 18] [nu = 1] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 1634] [nf = 36] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 4524] [nf = 144] [nu = 5] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 8196] [nf = 304] [nu = 8] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 13100] [nf = 597] [nu = 17] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 20882] [nf = 1193] [nu = 40] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 31699] [nf = 2175] [nu = 74] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 48302] [nf = 3910] [nu = 140] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 4 secs [nr = 76056] [nf = 7101] [nu = 266] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 5 secs [nr = 118893] [nf = 12367] [nu = 470] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 7 secs [nr = 189546] [nf = 21438] [nu = 845] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 12 secs [nr = 313927] [nf = 37334] [nu = 1606] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 19 secs [nr = 522787] [nf = 64787] [nu = 2983] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 873946] [nf = 111528] [nu = 5389] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 55 secs [nr = 1474738] [nf = 192485] [nu = 9501] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 93 secs [nr = 2473535] [nf = 328010] [nu = 16456] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 3220110] [nf = 428471] [nu = 21625] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 3220900] [nf = 428489] [nu = 21626] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 3225625] [nf = 428763] [nu = 21628] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 3258008] [nf = 430476] [nu = 21632] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 125 secs [nr = 3478493] [nf = 448249] [nu = 21639] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 136 secs [nr = 4823749] [nf = 567407] [nu = 21665] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 211 secs [nr = 13434073] [nf = 1594188] [nu = 21724] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 26793147
% 	resolvents: 23762902	factors: 3030245
% Number of unit clauses generated: 21782
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.08
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [2] = 1		[13] = 1		
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 21782	[2] = 687104	[3] = 3252214	[4] = 3176422	[5] = 12281915	[6] = 6042717	
% [7] = 1286446	[8] = 40897	[9] = 1189	[10] = 612	[11] = 472	[12] = 274	
% [13] = 460	[14] = 585	[15] = 58	
% Average size of a generated clause: 5.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c10_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [1] c1_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [2] c2_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [3] c3_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [4] c4_0		(+)0	(-)1
% [5] c5_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [6] c6_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [7] c7_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [8] c8_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [9] c9_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [10] ndr1_0		(+)1	(-)0
% [11] ssSkC0		(+)0	(-)0
% [12] ssSkC1		(+)0	(-)0
% [13] ssSkC10		(+)0	(-)0
% [14] ssSkC11		(+)0	(-)0
% [15] ssSkC12		(+)0	(-)0
% [16] ssSkC13		(+)0	(-)0
% [17] ssSkC14		(+)0	(-)0
% [18] ssSkC15		(+)0	(-)0
% [19] ssSkC16		(+)0	(-)0
% [20] ssSkC17		(+)0	(-)0
% [21] ssSkC18		(+)0	(-)0
% [22] ssSkC19		(+)0	(-)0
% [23] ssSkC2		(+)0	(-)0
% [24] ssSkC20		(+)0	(-)0
% [25] ssSkC21		(+)0	(-)0
% [26] ssSkC22		(+)0	(-)0
% [27] ssSkC23		(+)0	(-)0
% [28] ssSkC24		(+)0	(-)0
% [29] ssSkC25		(+)0	(-)0
% [30] ssSkC26		(+)0	(-)0
% [31] ssSkC27		(+)0	(-)0
% [32] ssSkC28		(+)0	(-)0
% [33] ssSkC29		(+)0	(-)0
% [34] ssSkC3		(+)0	(-)0
% [35] ssSkC30		(+)0	(-)0
% [36] ssSkC31		(+)0	(-)0
% [37] ssSkC32		(+)0	(-)0
% [38] ssSkC33		(+)0	(-)0
% [39] ssSkC34		(+)0	(-)0
% [40] ssSkC4		(+)0	(-)0
% [41] ssSkC5		(+)0	(-)0
% [42] ssSkC6		(+)0	(-)0
% [43] ssSkC7		(+)0	(-)0
% [44] ssSkC8		(+)0	(-)0
% [45] ssSkC9		(+)0	(-)0
% [46] c10_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [47] c1_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [48] c2_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [49] c3_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [50] c4_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [51] c5_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [52] c6_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [53] c7_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [54] c8_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [55] c9_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [56] ndr1_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [57] ssSkP0_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [58] ssSkP10_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [59] ssSkP11_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [60] ssSkP12_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [61] ssSkP13_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [62] ssSkP14_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [63] ssSkP15_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [64] ssSkP16_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [65] ssSkP17_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [66] ssSkP1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [67] ssSkP2_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [68] ssSkP3_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [69] ssSkP4_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [70] ssSkP5_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [71] ssSkP6_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [72] ssSkP7_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [73] ssSkP8_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [74] ssSkP9_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [75] c10_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [76] c1_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [77] c2_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [78] c3_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [79] c4_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [80] c5_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [81] c6_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [82] c7_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [83] c8_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [84] c9_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)1	(-)1
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1824425372
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 831210627
% Number of successful unifications: 26793147
% Number of unification failures: 144697
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 427063852
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2189505736
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 9154
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 336
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 26937844
% ConstructUnitClause() = 9156
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 89310
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------