## TSTP Solution File: SYN721+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

```%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SYN721+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:56:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.83s 2.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   7 sgn)

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1,X1)
| ~ r(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ro951xl/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
r(a,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ro951xl/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q(X1,a)
| ~ r(b,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ro951xl/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( r(X1,X2)
| ~ q(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ro951xl/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1,X1)
| ~ r(X1,X2) ),
i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
r(a,b),
i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q(X1,a)
| ~ r(b,X1) ),
i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
q(a,a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( r(X1,X2)
| ~ q(X3,X2) ),
i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ r(b,a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
r(X1,a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
\$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SYN721+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 20:55:00 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  :
% 0.20/0.47  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.83/2.44  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.83/2.44  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.83/2.44  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.83/2.44  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic H_____047_C18_F1_PI_AE_R8_CS_SP_S2S
% 7.83/2.44  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.83/2.44  #
% 7.83/2.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 7.83/2.44
% 7.83/2.44  # Proof found!
% 7.83/2.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.83/2.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.83/2.44  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.83/2.44
% 7.83/2.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.83/2.44  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 7.83/2.44  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 7.83/2.44  # Total time               : 0.029 s
% 7.83/2.44  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.83/2.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```