TSTP Solution File: SYN721+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SYN721+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:13:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN721+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 20:54:28 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.13/0.36 #
% 0.13/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.36 # Number of axioms: 4 Number of unprocessed: 4
% 0.13/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.36 # 4 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.36 # There are 4 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.36 # Found 1 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.13/0.36 # 4 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.36 # 3 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.36 # 1 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4
% 0.13/0.36 # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.36 # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on
% 0.13/0.36 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 0 folds and 1 closures done.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.36 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 1 folds and 1 closures done.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.36 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (r(a,b))).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (~q(X1,a)|~r(b,X1))).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (r(X1,X2)|~q(X3,X2))).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (q(X1,X1)|~r(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.13/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.13/0.36 # Found 6 steps
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (~q(a,a)|~r(b,a)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (~r(b,a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2])).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (~q(a,a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_3])).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (~r(a,b)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~q(a,a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_3])).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (~r(a,b)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.13/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.13/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.13/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.13/0.36 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (r(a,b))).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (~q(X1,a)|~r(b,X1))).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (r(X1,X2)|~q(X3,X2))).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (q(X1,X1)|~r(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.13/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.13/0.36 # Found 5 steps
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (~q(a,a)|~r(b,a)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~q(a,a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_3])).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (~r(a,b)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (~r(b,a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2])).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (~q(a,a)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.13/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.13/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.13/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.13/0.37 # Child (31852) has found a proof.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 # Proof search is over...
% 0.13/0.37 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------